In 2016, computer scientist Joy Buolamwini made a striking discovery at the MIT Media Lab—facial analysis software could not detect her face unless she wore a white mask, due to biased training data favoring light-skinned individuals.

AI chatbots have become a daily fixture, from customer support and virtual assistants to AI companions. But behind their smooth conversations lies a complex system that even their creators sometimes struggle to fully explain. This opacity is what many refer to as the “black box” problem in AI: we see the inputs and outputs, but not always the logic in between.

When you sign up for a new app or platform, you’re often asked to “agree” to the terms of service and privacy policies. But what does that consent mean, and is it meaningful?

Health and wellness apps have surged in popularity, but their privacy practices are often murky. An analysis of 10 top apps — from fitness trackers to meditation and period-tracking apps — reveals that most collect far more data than necessary and reserve the right to share it with advertisers or data brokers.

AI is transforming consumer lending, promising faster credit decisions and greater access. But the reality is more complicated. Many AI-based scoring systems rely on alternative data — utility payments, online behavior, even social media activity — to predict creditworthiness.

Despite growing public awareness and new privacy laws, data broker companies that buy, sell, and aggregate personal information continue to thrive. These firms compile data from credit reports, social media, app usage, and even offline purchases, building profiles that can include thousands of data points per person.

In a significant development within the 2025 federal budget bill, lawmakers have proposed a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI regulation. This provision, supported by major tech lobbying groups and some Republican legislators, aims to establish a uniform national standard for AI governance. Proponents argue that avoiding a fragmented regulatory patchwork will reduce legal complexity and foster innovation and economic competitiveness.

New Orleans is at the center of a national debate as it considers an ordinance to legalize real-time facial recognition surveillance across the city.

A new IBM global study highlights a troubling gap between AI policy rhetoric and real-world governance. Although 80% of executives say AI governance is critical to responsible innovation, only 20-30% have put robust practices in place.